On 04/29/13 13:05, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130426: >> > > > (who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?) > > > on x86_64: > > warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) > > because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. > > > Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS? > > and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt, > which does not exist. Please add the file. Oops, sorry, I looked in the wrong place for that file, which DOES exist. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>