> +static void memcg_vmpressure_shrink_dead(void)
> +{
> + struct memcg_cache_params *params, *tmp;
> + struct kmem_cache *cachep;
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&dangling_memcgs_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(memcg, &dangling_memcgs, dead) {
> +
> + mem_cgroup_get(memcg);
This mem_cgroup_get() looks redundant to me, because you're iterating the list
and never release dangling_memcgs_mutex in the middle.
> + mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
> + /* The element may go away as an indirect result of shrink */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(params, tmp,
> + &memcg->memcg_slab_caches, list) {
> +
> + cachep = memcg_params_to_cache(params);
> + /*
> + * the cpu_hotplug lock is taken in kmem_cache_create
> + * outside the slab_caches_mutex manipulation. It will
> + * be taken by kmem_cache_shrink to flush the cache.
> + * So we need to drop the lock. It is all right because
> + * the lock only protects elements moving in and out the
> + * list.
> + */
> + mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
> + kmem_cache_shrink(cachep);
> + mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
> + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&dangling_memcgs_mutex);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>