Re: [PATCHv3, RFC 31/34] thp: initial implementation of do_huge_linear_fault()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/18/2013 09:38 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 04/18/2013 09:09 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> Dave Hansen wrote:
>>>> On 04/17/2013 07:38 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>>> Are you still sure you can't do _any_ better than a verbatim copy of 129
>>>> lines?
>>>
>>> It seems I was too lazy. Shame on me. :(
>>> Here's consolidated version. Only build tested. Does it look better?
>>
>> Yeah, it's definitely a step in the right direction.  There rae
>> definitely some bugs in there like:
>>
>> +	unsigned long haddr = address & PAGE_MASK;
> 
> It's not bug. It's bad name for the variable.
> See, first 'if (try_huge_pages)'. I update it there for huge page case.
> 
> addr_aligned better?

That's a criminally bad name. :)

addr_aligned is better, and also please initialize the two cases
together.  It's mean to separate them.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]