On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > When hot removing memory presented at boot time, following messages are shown: > > [ 296.867031] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 296.922273] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3409! > [ 296.970229] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP > [ 297.019453] Modules linked in: ebtable_nat ebtables xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle bridge stp llc ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler sunrpc ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables binfmt_misc vfat fat dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod vhost_net macvtap macvlan tun uinput iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel microcode pcspkr sg i2c_i801 lpc_ich mfd_core igb i2c_algo_bit i2c_core e1000e ptp pps_core tpm_infineon ioatdma dca sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif usb_storage megaraid_sas lpfc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt scsi_mod > [ 297.747808] CPU 0 > [ 297.769764] Pid: 5091, comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G W 3.9.0-rc6+ #15 > [ 297.897917] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811c41d2>] [<ffffffff811c41d2>] kfree+0x232/0x240 > [ 297.988634] RSP: 0018:ffff88084678d968 EFLAGS: 00010246 > [ 298.052196] RAX: 0060000000000400 RBX: ffff8987fffffea0 RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 298.137595] RDX: ffffffff8107a5ae RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8987fffffea0 > [ 298.222994] RBP: ffff88084678d998 R08: 0000000080000200 R09: 0000000000000001 > [ 298.308390] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000030000000000 > [ 298.393792] R13: ffffea061fffffc0 R14: 00000303ffffffff R15: 0000000000000080 > [ 298.479190] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88085aa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 298.576030] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 298.644791] CR2: 00000000025d3f78 CR3: 0000000001c0c000 CR4: 00000000001407f0 > [ 298.730192] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > [ 298.815590] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > [ 298.900997] Process kworker/0:2 (pid: 5091, threadinfo ffff88084678c000, task ffff88083928ca80) > [ 299.005121] Stack: > [ 299.029156] 00000303ffffffff ffff8987fffffea0 0000030000000000 ffff8987fffffe90 > [ 299.118116] 00000303ffffffff 0000000000000080 ffff88084678d9c8 ffffffff8107a5d4 > [ 299.207084] 0000000030000000 ffff8987fffb2680 0000000000000080 0000000030000000 > [ 299.296045] Call Trace: > [ 299.325288] [<ffffffff8107a5d4>] __release_region+0xd4/0xe0 > [ 299.393020] [<ffffffff811c96f2>] __remove_pages+0x52/0x110 > [ 299.459707] [<ffffffff816ada89>] arch_remove_memory+0x89/0xd0 > [ 299.529505] [<ffffffff816aec94>] remove_memory+0xc4/0x100 > [ 299.595145] [<ffffffff814103c5>] acpi_memory_device_remove+0x6d/0xb1 > [ 299.672230] [<ffffffff813cbfe3>] acpi_device_remove+0x89/0xab > [ 299.742033] [<ffffffff81479f4c>] __device_release_driver+0x7c/0xf0 > [ 299.817048] [<ffffffff8147a0cf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50 > [ 299.889972] [<ffffffff813cce98>] acpi_bus_device_detach+0x6c/0x70 > [ 299.963938] [<ffffffff813f80f6>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x11a/0x250 > [ 300.039982] [<ffffffff813cce2c>] ? power_state_show+0x36/0x36 > [ 300.109800] [<ffffffff813cce2c>] ? power_state_show+0x36/0x36 > [ 300.179612] [<ffffffff813f874d>] acpi_walk_namespace+0xee/0x137 > [ 300.251492] [<ffffffff813ccecf>] acpi_bus_trim+0x33/0x7a > [ 300.316089] [<ffffffff816c182a>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x4a/0x60 > [ 300.386927] [<ffffffff813cdca6>] acpi_bus_hot_remove_device+0xc4/0x1a1 > [ 300.466096] [<ffffffff813c8009>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x27/0x34 > [ 300.542137] [<ffffffff81093467>] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x590 > [ 300.611940] [<ffffffff810933f5>] ? process_one_work+0x185/0x590 > [ 300.683823] [<ffffffff81094bba>] worker_thread+0x11a/0x370 > [ 300.750502] [<ffffffff81094aa0>] ? manage_workers+0x180/0x180 > [ 300.820308] [<ffffffff8109adfe>] kthread+0xee/0x100 > [ 300.879714] [<ffffffff810e139b>] ? __lock_release+0x12b/0x190 > [ 300.949512] [<ffffffff8109ad10>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 > [ 301.024517] [<ffffffff816cf32c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > [ 301.089135] [<ffffffff8109ad10>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70 > [ 301.164138] Code: 89 ef e8 c2 2c fb ff e9 0b ff ff ff 4d 8b 6d 30 e9 5c fe ff ff 4c 89 f1 48 89 da 4c 89 ee 4c 89 e7 e8 03 f9 ff ff e9 ec fe ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec > [ 301.397214] RIP [<ffffffff811c41d2>] kfree+0x232/0x240 > [ 301.459855] RSP <ffff88084678d968> > [ 301.501675] ---[ end trace 8679967aa8606ed8 ]--- > > The reason why the messages are shown is to release a resource structure, > allocated by bootmem, by kfree(). So when we release a resource structure, > we should check whether it is allocated by bootmem or not. > > But even if we know a resource structure is allocated by bootmem, we cannot > release it since SLxB cannot treat it. So for reusing a resource structure, > this patch remembers it by using bootmem_resource as follows: > > When releasing a resource structure by free_resource(), free_resource() checks > whether the resource structure is allocated by bootmem or not. If it is > allocated by bootmem, free_resource() adds it to bootmem_resource. If it is > not allocated by bootmem, free_resource() release it by kfree(). > > And when getting a new resource structure by get_resource(), get_resource() > checks whether bootmem_resource has released resource structures or not. If > there is a released resource structure, get_resource() returns it. If there is > not a releaed resource structure, get_resource() returns new resource structure > allocated by kzalloc(). > I think this is _way_ too complex and could be done without leaking memory that you may never allocate again through get_resource(). Why not simply do what generic sparsemem support does by testing PageSlab(virt_to_head_page(res)) and calling kfree() if true and freeing back to bootmem if false? This should be like a five line patch. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>