Hi Pavel, On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:51:36 +0400 Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As Stephen Rothwell pointed out, config options, that depend on > architecture support, are better to be wrapped into a select + > depends on scheme. > > Do this for CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY, as it currently works only > for X86. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpujo5NBubcb.pgp
Description: PGP signature