Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: vmemmap: add vmemmap_verify check for hot-add node/memory case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 3. If we add flag to memblock, we can mark different memory. And I remember
>    you mentioned before that we can use memblock to reserve local node data
>    for node-life-cycle data, like vmemmap, pagetable.
>
>    So are you doing the similar work now ?

No, i did not start it yet.

>
>    If not, I think I can merge it into mine, and push a new patch-set with
>    hot-add, hot-remove code modified to support putting vmemmap, pagetable,
>    pgdat, page_cgroup, ..., on local node.

Need to have it separated with moving_zone.

1. rework memblock to keep alive all the way for hotplug usage.
2. put pagetable and vmemap on the local node range with help of memblock.


Thanks

Yinghai

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]