Hi Jerome,
On 04/11/2013 04:55 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:57:02AM +0800, Simon Jeons wrote:
Hi Jerome,
On 02/10/2013 12:29 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Shachar Raindel <raindel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
We would like to present a reference implementation for safely sharing
memory pages from user space with the hardware, without pinning.
We will be happy to hear the community feedback on our prototype
implementation, and suggestions for future improvements.
We would also like to discuss adding features to the core MM subsystem to
assist hardware access to user memory without pinning.
This sounds kinda scary TBH; however I do understand the need for such
technology.
I think one issue is that many MM developers are insufficiently aware
of such developments; having a technology presentation would probably
help there; but traditionally LSF/MM sessions are more interactive
between developers who are already quite familiar with the technology.
I think it would help if you could send in advance a detailed
presentation of the problem and the proposed solutions (and then what
they require of the MM layer) so people can be better prepared.
And first I'd like to ask, aren't IOMMUs supposed to already largely
solve this problem ? (probably a dumb question, but that just tells
you how much you need to explain :)
For GPU the motivation is three fold. With the advance of GPU compute
and also with newer graphic program we see a massive increase in GPU
memory consumption. We easily can reach buffer that are bigger than
1gbytes. So the first motivation is to directly use the memory the
user allocated through malloc in the GPU this avoid copying 1gbytes of
data with the cpu to the gpu buffer. The second and mostly important
to GPU compute is the use of GPU seamlessly with the CPU, in order to
achieve this you want the programmer to have a single address space on
the CPU and GPU. So that the same address point to the same object on
GPU as on the CPU. This would also be a tremendous cleaner design from
driver point of view toward memory management.
When GPU will comsume memory?
The userspace process like mplayer will have video datas and GPU
will play this datas and use memory of mplayer since these video
datas load in mplayer process's address space? So GPU codes will
call gup to take a reference of memory? Please correct me if my
understanding is wrong. ;-)
First target is not thing such as video decompression, however they could
too benefit from it given updated driver kernel API. In case of using
iommu hardware page fault we don't call get_user_pages (gup) those we
don't take a reference on the page. That's the whole point of the hardware
pagefault, not taking reference on the page.
mplayer process is running on normal CPU or GPU?
chipset_integrated graphics will use normal memory and discrete graphics
will use its own memory, correct? So the memory used by discrete
graphics won't need gup, correct?
Cheers,
Jerome Glisse
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>