On 04/09/2013 12:51 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:00:27 +0400 Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Cc: Dave Shrinnker <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I keep on receiving emails from people who claim they can fix this. > =) >> This patchset implements targeted shrinking for memcg when kmem limits are >> present. So far, we've been accounting kernel objects but failing allocations >> when short of memory. This is because our only option would be to call the >> global shrinker, depleting objects from all caches and breaking isolation. > > This is a fine-looking patchset and it even has some acks and reviews. > But it's huuuuge and we're at -rc6 and I've been offline for a week and > have 975 emails in my to-apply folder. > > So, err, I think I'll bestow upon everyone some additional time to > review the code ;) Please resend for -rc1? > Sure. This was still a mostly asynchronous submission. I also believe I would have to rebase on top of Li Zefan's patchset that made some very important refcount cleanups in memcg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>