On 04/07/2013 08:23 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > (4/5/13 4:33 PM), Cody P Schafer wrote: >> In one case while modifying the ->high and ->batch fields of per cpu pagesets >> we're unneededly using stop_machine() (patches 1 & 2), and in another we don't have any >> syncronization at all (patch 3). >> >> This patchset fixes both of them. >> >> Note that it results in a change to the behavior of zone_pcp_update(), which is >> used by memory_hotplug. I _think_ that I've diserned (and preserved) the >> essential behavior (changing ->high and ->batch), and only eliminated unneeded >> actions (draining the per cpu pages), but this may not be the case. > > at least, memory hotplug need to drain. Could you explain why the drain is required here? From what I can tell, after the stop_machine() completes, the per cpu page sets could be repopulated at any point, making the combination of draining and modifying ->batch & ->high uneeded. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>