On 04/06/2013 09:55 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
@@ -5186,6 +5189,22 @@ early_param("movablecore", cmdline_parse_movablecore);
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
+void adjust_managed_page_count(struct page *page, long count)
+{
+ bool lock = (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING);
+
+ /* No need to acquire the lock during boot */
+ if (lock)
+ spin_lock(&managed_page_count_lock);
+
+ page_zone(page)->managed_pages += count;
+ totalram_pages += count;
+
+ if (lock)
+ spin_unlock(&managed_page_count_lock);
+}
While I agree the boot code currently does not need the lock, is
there any harm to removing that conditional?
That would simplify the code, and protect against possible future
cleverness of initializing multiple memory things simultaneously.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>