Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] fix hugetlb memory check in vma_dump_size()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(4/3/13 2:35 PM), Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt says about coredump_filter bitmask,
> 
>   Note bit 0-4 doesn't effect any hugetlb memory. hugetlb memory are only
>   effected by bit 5-6.
> 
> However current code can go into the subsequent flag checks of bit 0-4
> for vma(VM_HUGETLB). So this patch inserts 'return' and makes it work
> as written in the document.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

If I were you, I merge this patch into [1/3] because both patches treat the same
regression. but it is no big matter.

Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]