On 04/05/2013 02:01 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > Hi, > > Last time I sent the mem cgroup bypass patches, Kame and Michal pointed out > that some of it was a bit of cleanup, specifically at the page_cgroup side. > I've decided to separate those patches and send them separately. After these > patches are applied, page_cgroup will be initialized together with the root > cgroup, instead of init/main.c > > When we move cgroup initialization to the first non-root cgroup created, all > we'll have to do from the page_cgroup side would be to move the initialization > that now happens at root, to the first child. > > Glauber Costa (2): > memcg: consistently use vmalloc for page_cgroup allocations > memcg: defer page_cgroup initialization > > include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 21 +------------------ > init/main.c | 2 -- > mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++ > mm/page_cgroup.c | 51 +++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > FYI: There are kbuild warnings with this. I wanted to send it earlier to see what people think. If there is no changes requested, please let me know I will send a new version with just the kbuild fixes folded. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>