Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] cgroup: make sure parent won't be destroyed before its children

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:20:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > But what harm does an additional reference do?
> 
> No harm at all. I just wanted to be sure that this is not yet another
> "for memcg" hack. So if this is useful for other controllers then I have
> no objections of course.

I think it makes sense in general, so let's do it in cgroup core.  I
suppose it'd be easier for this to be routed together with other memcg
changes?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]