On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 08:17:36AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:50:47AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c
> > @@ -1753,9 +1753,7 @@ static int zcache_init(void)
> > namestr = "ramster";
> > ramster_register_pamops(&zcache_pamops);
> > }
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > zcache_debugfs_init();
> > -#endif
> > if (zcache_enabled) {
> > unsigned int cpu;
> >
>
> That looks OK, and should be as a seperate patch - as there are no compilation
> failures with zcache-main.c
No, make it in the same patch, it is relevant here.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>