On Fri 22-03-13 16:23:48, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > Currently migrate_huge_page() takes a pointer to a hugepage to be > migrated as an argument, instead of taking a pointer to the list of > hugepages to be migrated. This behavior was introduced in commit > 189ebff28 ("hugetlb: simplify migrate_huge_page()"), and was OK > because until now hugepage migration is enabled only for soft-offlining > which takes only one hugepage in a single call. > > But the situation will change in the later patches in this series > which enable other users of page migration to support hugepage migration. > They can kick migration for both of normal pages and hugepages > in a single call, so we need to go back to original implementation > of using linked lists to collect the hugepages to be migrated. If the purpose of this patch is to reduce code duplication then you should remove migrate_huge_page as it doesn't have any caller anymore. [...] > @@ -1482,12 +1483,20 @@ static int soft_offline_huge_page(struct page *page, int flags) > unlock_page(hpage); > > /* Keep page count to indicate a given hugepage is isolated. */ > - ret = migrate_huge_page(hpage, new_page, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL, > - MIGRATE_SYNC); > - put_page(hpage); > + list_move(&hpage->lru, &pagelist); > + ret = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL, > + MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_FAILURE); > if (ret) { > pr_info("soft offline: %#lx: migration failed %d, type %lx\n", > pfn, ret, page->flags); > + /* > + * We know that soft_offline_huge_page() tries to migrate > + * only one hugepage pointed to by hpage, so we need not > + * run through the pagelist here. > + */ > + putback_active_hugepage(hpage); Maybe I am missing something but why we didn't need to call this before when using migrate_huge_page? > + if (ret > 0) > + ret = -EIO; > } else { > set_page_hwpoison_huge_page(hpage); > dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page(hpage); > diff --git v3.9-rc3.orig/mm/migrate.c v3.9-rc3/mm/migrate.c > index f69f354..66030b6 100644 > --- v3.9-rc3.orig/mm/migrate.c > +++ v3.9-rc3/mm/migrate.c > @@ -981,6 +981,8 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_page_t get_new_page, > > unlock_page(hpage); > out: > + if (rc != -EAGAIN) > + putback_active_hugepage(hpage); And why do you put it here? If it is called from migrate_pages then the caller already does the clean-up (putback_lru_pages). > put_page(new_hpage); > if (result) { > if (rc) > -- > 1.7.11.7 > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>