Hello.
On 24-03-2013 11:25, Jiang Liu wrote:
The global variable num_physpages is scheduled to be removed, so use
totalram_pages instead of num_physpages at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: fuse-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 +-
kernel/power/snapshot.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index b730fda..4c2a420 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static const struct super_operations fuse_super_operations = {
static void sanitize_global_limit(unsigned *limit)
{
if (*limit == 0)
- *limit = ((num_physpages << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 13) /
+ *limit = ((totalram_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 13) /
sizeof(struct fuse_req);
if (*limit >= 1 << 16)
diff --git a/kernel/power/snapshot.c b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
index 0de2857..8b5d1cd 100644
--- a/kernel/power/snapshot.c
+++ b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
@@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ unsigned long snapshot_get_image_size(void)
static int init_header(struct swsusp_info *info)
{
memset(info, 0, sizeof(struct swsusp_info));
- info->num_physpages = num_physpages;
+ info->num_physpages = get_num_physpages();
info->image_pages = nr_copy_pages;
info->pages = snapshot_get_image_size();
info->size = info->pages;
@@ -1795,7 +1795,7 @@ static int check_header(struct swsusp_info *info)
char *reason;
reason = check_image_kernel(info);
- if (!reason && info->num_physpages != num_physpages)
+ if (!reason && info->num_physpages != get_num_physpages())
reason = "memory size";
if (reason) {
printk(KERN_ERR "PM: Image mismatch: %s\n", reason);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
index 4750d2b..94a99a1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ void inet_frags_init(struct inet_frags *f)
rwlock_init(&f->lock);
- f->rnd = (u32) ((num_physpages ^ (num_physpages>>7)) ^
+ f->rnd = (u32) ((totalram_pages ^ (totalram_pages>>7)) ^
(jiffies ^ (jiffies >> 6)));
setup_timer(&f->secret_timer, inet_frag_secret_rebuild,
Isn't patch 37 the same as patch 9?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>