Re: [PATCHv2, RFC 07/30] thp, mm: introduce mapping_can_have_hugepages() predicate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static inline bool mapping_can_have_hugepages(struct address_space *m)
> > +{
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
> > +		gfp_t gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(m);
> > +		return !!(gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> 
> I did a quick search in all your patches and don't see __GFP_COMP
> getting _set_ anywhere.  Am I missing something?

__GFP_COMP is part of GFP_TRANSHUGE. We set it for ramfs in patch 20/30.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]