On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:21:19PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 12-03-13 06:34:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:05:04PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > The fix is quite simple. We can pull the key inside bus_type structure > > > because they are defined per device so the pointer will be unique as > > > well. bus_register doesn't need to be a macro anymore so change it > > > to the inline. We could get rid of __bus_register as there is no other > > > caller but maybe somebody will want to use a different key so keep it > > > around for now. > > > > Nice work, but just drop __bus_register(), no one should need to use a > > new key for this type of thing, now that you have added a per-bus_type > > variable. > > OK v2 below. I have also ranamed __key to lock_key. Who is going to take > the patch? I will, thanks. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>