Re: [PATCH] device: separate all subsys mutexes (was: Re: [BUG] potential deadlock led by cpu_hotplug lock (memcg involved))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:28:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 14:05 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > @@ -111,17 +111,17 @@ struct bus_type {
> >         struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops;
> >  
> >         struct subsys_private *p;
> > +       struct lock_class_key __key;
> >  };
> 
> Is struct bus_type constrained to static storage or can people go an
> allocate this stuff dynamically? If so, this patch is broken.

I don't think anyone is creating this dynamically, it should be static.
Why does this matter, does the lockdep code care about where the
variable is declared (heap vs. static)?

thanks,

greg k-h

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]