Re: + mm-show_mem-suppress-page-counts-in-non-blockable-contexts.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:

> I have already asked about it in the original thread but didn't get any
> answer. How can we get a soft lockup when all implementations of show_mem
> call touch_nmi_watchdog?
> 

Feel free to do s/soft lockups/irqs being disabled for an extremely long 
time/.

> I do agree with the change but the above justification seems misleading.
> Can we just remove the information because it is costly and doesn't give
> us anything relevant to debug allocation failures?
> 

I believe I have already said yes, that all pertinent information is 
already there and I do not believe this additional information 
continuously spewed to the kernel log is helpful in debugging VM issues or 
understanding why the oom condition exists.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]