Re: [PATCH 1/7] ksm: add some comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/21/2013 04:19 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Added slightly more detail to the Documentation of merge_across_nodes,
a few comments in areas indicated by review, and renamed get_ksm_page()'s
argument from "locked" to "lock_it".  No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/vm/ksm.txt |   16 ++++++++++++----
  mm/ksm.c                 |   18 ++++++++++++++----
  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- mmotm.orig/Documentation/vm/ksm.txt	2013-02-20 22:28:09.456001057 -0800
+++ mmotm/Documentation/vm/ksm.txt	2013-02-20 22:28:23.580001392 -0800
@@ -60,10 +60,18 @@ sleep_millisecs  - how many milliseconds
merge_across_nodes - specifies if pages from different numa nodes can be merged.
                     When set to 0, ksm merges only pages which physically
-                   reside in the memory area of same NUMA node. It brings
-                   lower latency to access to shared page. Value can be
-                   changed only when there is no ksm shared pages in system.
-                   Default: 1
+                   reside in the memory area of same NUMA node. That brings
+                   lower latency to access of shared pages. Systems with more
+                   nodes, at significant NUMA distances, are likely to benefit
+                   from the lower latency of setting 0. Smaller systems, which
+                   need to minimize memory usage, are likely to benefit from
+                   the greater sharing of setting 1 (default). You may wish to
+                   compare how your system performs under each setting, before
+                   deciding on which to use. merge_across_nodes setting can be
+                   changed only when there are no ksm shared pages in system:
+                   set run 2 to unmerge pages first, then to 1 after changing
+                   merge_across_nodes, to remerge according to the new setting.

What's the root reason merge_across_nodes setting just can be changed only when there are no ksm shared pages in system? Can they be unmerged and merged again during ksmd scan?

+                   Default: 1 (merging across nodes as in earlier releases)
run - set 0 to stop ksmd from running but keep merged pages,
                     set 1 to run ksmd e.g. "echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run",
--- mmotm.orig/mm/ksm.c	2013-02-20 22:28:09.456001057 -0800
+++ mmotm/mm/ksm.c	2013-02-20 22:28:23.584001392 -0800
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@
   *    take 10 attempts to find a page in the unstable tree, once it is found,
   *    it is secured in the stable tree.  (When we scan a new page, we first
   *    compare it against the stable tree, and then against the unstable tree.)
+ *
+ * If the merge_across_nodes tunable is unset, then KSM maintains multiple
+ * stable trees and multiple unstable trees: one of each for each NUMA node.
   */
/**
@@ -524,7 +527,7 @@ static void remove_node_from_stable_tree
   * a page to put something that might look like our key in page->mapping.
   * is on its way to being freed; but it is an anomaly to bear in mind.
   */
-static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct stable_node *stable_node, bool locked)
+static struct page *get_ksm_page(struct stable_node *stable_node, bool lock_it)
  {
  	struct page *page;
  	void *expected_mapping;
@@ -573,7 +576,7 @@ again:
  		goto stale;
  	}
- if (locked) {
+	if (lock_it) {
  		lock_page(page);
  		if (ACCESS_ONCE(page->mapping) != expected_mapping) {
  			unlock_page(page);
@@ -703,10 +706,17 @@ static int remove_stable_node(struct sta
  		return 0;
  	}
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapped(page)))
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(page_mapped(page))) {
+		/*
+		 * This should not happen: but if it does, just refuse to let
+		 * merge_across_nodes be switched - there is no need to panic.
+		 */
  		err = -EBUSY;
-	else {
+	} else {
  		/*
+		 * The stable node did not yet appear stale to get_ksm_page(),
+		 * since that allows for an unmapped ksm page to be recognized
+		 * right up until it is freed; but the node is safe to remove.
  		 * This page might be in a pagevec waiting to be freed,
  		 * or it might be PageSwapCache (perhaps under writeback),
  		 * or it might have been removed from swapcache a moment ago.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]