Re: [patch] mm: mlock: document scary-looking stack expansion mlock chain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/01/2013 02:10 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
The fact that mlock calls get_user_pages, and get_user_pages might
call mlock when expanding a stack looks like a potential recursion.
Why expand stack need call mlock? I can't find it in the codes, could 
you point out to me?
However, mlock makes sure the requested range is already contained
within a vma, so no stack expansion will actually happen from mlock.

Should this ever change: the stack expansion mlocks only the newly
expanded range and so will not result in recursive expansion.

Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/mlock.c | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index b1647fb..78c4924 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -185,6 +185,10 @@ long __mlock_vma_pages_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  	if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC))
  		gup_flags |= FOLL_FORCE;
+ /*
+	 * We made sure addr is within a VMA, so the following will
+	 * not result in a stack expansion that recurses back here.
+	 */
  	return __get_user_pages(current, mm, addr, nr_pages, gup_flags,
  				NULL, NULL, nonblocking);
  }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]