On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:27:05 +0100 > Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The total number of low memory pages is determined as >> totalram_pages - totalhigh_pages, so without this patch all CMA >> pageblocks placed in highmem were accounted to low memory. > > What are the end-user-visible effects of this bug? Even though CMA is located at highmem. LowTotal has more than lowmem address spaces. e.g., lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xdf000000 ( 496 MB) LowTotal: 555788 kB > > (This information is needed so that others can make patch-scheduling > decisions and should be included in all bugfix changelogs unless it is > obvious). CMA Highmem support is new feature. so don't need to go stable tree. Thank you, Kyungmin Park > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>