On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:53:22 +0800
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The allocation failure is caused by the big sizeof(struct parsed_partitions),
>> which is 64K in my 32bit box,
>
> Geeze.
>
> We could fix that nicely by making parsed_partitions.parts an array of
> pointers to a single `struct parsed_partition' and allocating those
> on-demand.
>
> But given the short-lived nature of this storage and the infrequency of
> check_partition(), that isn't necessary.
>
>> could you test the blow patch to see
>> if it can fix the allocation failure?
>
> (The patch is wordwrapped)
Sorry for that, I send out it for test.
>
>> ...
>>
>> @@ -106,18 +107,43 @@ static int (*check_part[])(struct parsed_partitions *) = {
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> +struct parsed_partitions *allocate_partitions(int nr)
>> +{
>> + struct parsed_partitions *state;
>> +
>> + state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct parsed_partitions), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> I personally prefer sizefo(*state) here. It means the reader doesn't
> have to scroll back to check things.
OK, will use sizeof(*state).
>> + if (!state)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + state->parts = vzalloc(nr * sizeof(state->parts[0]));
>> + if (!state->parts) {
>> + kfree(state);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>
> It doesn't really need to be this complex - we could just vmalloc the
> entire `struct parsed_partitions'. But I see that your change will
The above approach can save one 32K allocation approximately.
> cause us to allcoate much less memory in many situations, which is
> good. It should be mentioned in the changelog!
OK, I will add the changelog later.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>