Re: Bug#695182: [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Ben,

Thanks for the repeated explanations.

> PAE was a stop-gap ...
> ... [PAE] completely untenable.

Is this a good time to withdraw PAE, to tell the world that it does not
work? Maybe you should have had such comments in the code.

Seems that amd64 now works "somewhat": on Debian the linux-image package
is tricky to install, and linux-headers is even harder. Is there work
being done to make this smoother?

---

I am still not convinced by the "lowmem starvation" explanation: because
then PAE should have worked fine on my 3GB machine; maybe I should also
try PAE on my 512MB laptop. - Though, what do I know, have not yet found
the buggy line of code I believe is lurking there...

Thanks, Paul

Paul Szabo   psz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]