Re: [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Pavel and Dave,

> The assertion was that 4GB with no PAE passed a forkbomb test (ooming)
> while 4GB of RAM with PAE hung, thus _PAE_ is broken.

Yes, PAE is broken. Still, maybe the above needs slight correction:
non-PAE HIGHMEM4G passed the "sleep test": no OOM, nothing unexpected;
whereas PAE OOMed then hung (tested with various RAM from 3GB to 64GB).

The feeling I get is that amd64 is proposed as a drop-in replacement for
PAE, that support and development of PAE is gone, that PAE is dead.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   psz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]