Re: [PATCH, RFC 06/16] thp, mm: rewrite add_to_page_cache_locked() to support huge pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +       page_cache_get(page);
> +       spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> +       page->mapping = mapping;
> +       if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> +               int i;
> +               for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_CACHE_NR; i++) {
> +                       page_cache_get(page + i);
> +                       page[i].index = offset + i;
> +                       error = radix_tree_insert(&mapping->page_tree,
> +                                       offset + i, page + i);
> +                       if (error) {
> +                               page_cache_release(page + i);
> +                               break;
> +                       }

Is page count balanced with the following?


@@ -168,6 +180,9 @@ void delete_from_page_cache(struct page *page)

        if (freepage)
                freepage(page);
+       if (PageTransHuge(page))
+               for (i = 1; i < HPAGE_CACHE_NR; i++)
+                       page_cache_release(page);
        page_cache_release(page);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]