Re: [PATCH, RFC 06/16] thp, mm: rewrite add_to_page_cache_locked() to support huge pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ int add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
>                 pgoff_t offset, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  {
>         int error;
> +       int nr = 1;
>
>         VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
>         VM_BUG_ON(PageSwapBacked(page));
> @@ -450,31 +451,61 @@ int add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
>         error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge(page, current->mm,
>                                         gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
>         if (error)
> -               goto out;
> +               return error;

Due to PageCompound check, thp could not be charged effectively.
Any change added for charging it?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]