On 01/25/2013 02:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 25-01-13 14:05:04, Glauber Costa wrote: > [...] >>> Glauber Costa (6): >>> memcg: prevent changes to move_charge_at_immigrate during task attach >>> memcg: split part of memcg creation to css_online >>> memcg: fast hierarchy-aware child test. >>> memcg: replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific memcg_lock >>> memcg: increment static branch right after limit set. >>> memcg: avoid dangling reference count in creation failure. >>> >> >> Tejun, >> >> This applies ontop of your cpuset patches. Would you pick this (would be >> my choice), or would you rather have it routed through somewhere mmish ? > > I would vote to -mm. Or is there any specific reason to have it in > cgroup tree? It doesn't touch any cgroup core parts, does it? > Copying Andrew (retroactively sorry you weren't directly CCd on this one as well). I depend on css_online and the cgroup generic iterator. If they are already present @ -mm, then fine. (looking now, they seem to be...) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>