Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] memcg: increment static branch right after limit set.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 11-01-13 13:45:27, Glauber Costa wrote:
> We were deferring the kmemcg static branch increment to a later time,
> due to a nasty dependency between the cpu_hotplug lock, taken by the
> jump label update, and the cgroup_lock.
> 
> Now we no longer take the cgroup lock, and we can save ourselves the
> trouble.

What a relief.

> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 31 +++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 5f3adbc..f87d6d2 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4926,8 +4926,6 @@ static int memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct cgroup *cont, u64 val)
>  {
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> -	bool must_inc_static_branch = false;
> -
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>  	/*
>  	 * For simplicity, we won't allow this to be disabled.  It also can't
> @@ -4958,7 +4956,13 @@ static int memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct cgroup *cont, u64 val)
>  			res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, RESOURCE_MAX);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> -		must_inc_static_branch = true;
> +		static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
> +		/*
> +		 * setting the active bit after the inc will guarantee no one
> +		 * starts accounting before all call sites are patched
> +		 */
> +		memcg_kmem_set_active(memcg);
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * kmem charges can outlive the cgroup. In the case of slab
>  		 * pages, for instance, a page contain objects from various
> @@ -4970,27 +4974,6 @@ static int memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct cgroup *cont, u64 val)
>  		ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, val);
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&memcg_mutex);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * We are by now familiar with the fact that we can't inc the static
> -	 * branch inside cgroup_lock. See disarm functions for details. A
> -	 * worker here is overkill, but also wrong: After the limit is set, we
> -	 * must start accounting right away. Since this operation can't fail,
> -	 * we can safely defer it to here - no rollback will be needed.
> -	 *
> -	 * The boolean used to control this is also safe, because
> -	 * KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVATED guarantees that only one process will be
> -	 * able to set it to true;
> -	 */
> -	if (must_inc_static_branch) {
> -		static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
> -		/*
> -		 * setting the active bit after the inc will guarantee no one
> -		 * starts accounting before all call sites are patched
> -		 */
> -		memcg_kmem_set_active(memcg);
> -	}
> -
>  #endif
>  	return ret;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]