Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce new system call mvolatile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/02/2013 08:27 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
This patch adds new system call m[no]volatile.
If someone asks is_volatile system call, it could be added, too.

So some nits below from my initial playing around with this patchset.

+/*
+ * Return -EINVAL if range doesn't include a right vma at all.
+ * Return -ENOMEM with interrupting range opeartion if memory is not enough to
+ * merge/split vmas.
+ * Return 0 if range consists of only proper vmas.
+ * Return 1 if part of range includes inavlid area(ex, hole/huge/ksm/mlock/
+ * special area)
+ */
+SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mvolatile, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
+{
+	unsigned long end, tmp;
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
+	bool invalid = false;
+	int error = -EINVAL;
+
+	down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	if (start & ~PAGE_MASK)
+		goto out;
+
+	len &= PAGE_MASK;
+	if (!len)
+		goto out;
+
+	end = start + len;
+	if (end < start)
+		goto out;
+
+	vma = find_vma_prev(current->mm, start, &prev);
+	if (!vma)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (start > vma->vm_start)
+		prev = vma;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		/* Here start < (end|vma->vm_end). */
+		if (start < vma->vm_start) {
+			start = vma->vm_start;
+			if (start >= end)
+				goto out;
+			invalid = true;
+		}
+
+		/* Here vma->vm_start <= start < (end|vma->vm_end) */
+		tmp = vma->vm_end;
+		if (end < tmp)
+			tmp = end;
+
+		/* Here vma->vm_start <= start < tmp <= (end|vma->vm_end). */
+		error = do_mvolatile(vma, &prev, start, tmp);
+		if (error == -ENOMEM) {
+			up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+			return error;
+		}
+		if (error == -EINVAL)
+			invalid = true;
+		else
+			error = 0;
+		start = tmp;
+		if (prev && start < prev->vm_end)
+			start = prev->vm_end;
+		if (start >= end)
+			break;
+
+		vma = prev->vm_next;
+		if (!vma)
+			break;
+	}
+out:
+	up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	return invalid ? 1 : 0;
+}

The error logic here is really strange. If any of the early error cases are triggered (ie: (start & ~PAGE_MASK), etc), then we jump to out and return 0 (instead of EINVAL). I don't think that's what you intended.


+/*
+ * Return -ENOMEM with interrupting range opeartion if memory is not enough
+ * to merge/split vmas.
+ * Return 1 if part of range includes purged's one, otherwise, return 0
+ */
+SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mnovolatile, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
+{
+	unsigned long end, tmp;
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
+	int ret, error = -EINVAL;
+	bool is_purged = false;
+
+	down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+	if (start & ~PAGE_MASK)
+		goto out;
+
+	len &= PAGE_MASK;
+	if (!len)
+		goto out;
+
+	end = start + len;
+	if (end < start)
+		goto out;
+
+	vma = find_vma_prev(current->mm, start, &prev);
+	if (!vma)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (start > vma->vm_start)
+		prev = vma;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		/* Here start < (end|vma->vm_end). */
+		if (start < vma->vm_start) {
+			start = vma->vm_start;
+			if (start >= end)
+				goto out;
+		}
+
+		/* Here vma->vm_start <= start < (end|vma->vm_end) */
+		tmp = vma->vm_end;
+		if (end < tmp)
+			tmp = end;
+
+		/* Here vma->vm_start <= start < tmp <= (end|vma->vm_end). */
+		error = do_mnovolatile(vma, &prev, start, tmp, &is_purged);
+		if (error) {
+			WARN_ON(error != -ENOMEM);
+			goto out;
+		}
+		start = tmp;
+		if (prev && start < prev->vm_end)
+			start = prev->vm_end;
+		if (start >= end)
+			break;
+
+		vma = prev->vm_next;
+		if (!vma)
+			break;
+	}

I'm still not sure how this logic improves over the madvise case. If we catch an error mid-way through setting a series of vmas to non-volatile, we end up exiting and losing state (ie: if only the first vma was purged, but half way through 10 vmas we get a ENOMEM error. So the first vma is now non-volatile, but we do not return the purged flag ).

If we're going to have a new syscall for this (which I'm not sure is the right approach), we should make use of multiple arguments so we can return if data was purged, even if we hit an error midway).

Alternatively, if we can find a way to allocate any necessary memory before we do any vma volatility state changes, then we can return ENOMEM then and be confident we won't end up with failed partial state change (this is the approach I used in my fallocate-volatile patches).

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]