On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:50:20AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:56:42AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > I've added you to the this thread hoping for a little insight into USB
> > drivers and their use of coherent and GFP_ATOMIC. Am I barking up the
> > wrong tree by looking a the drivers?
>
> I don't understand, which drivers are you referring to? USB host
> controller drivers, or the "normal" drivers?
Sorry I wasn't clear, I was referring specifically to the usb dvb
drivers em28xx, drxk and dib0700. These are the drivers reported to be
in heavy use when the error occurs.
sata_mv is also in use, however no other users of sata_mv have reported
problems. Including myself. ;-)
> Most USB drivers use GFP_ATOMIC if they are creating memory during
> their URB callback path, as that is interrupt context. But it
> shouldn't be all that bad, and the USB core hasn't changed in a while,
> so something else must be causing this.
Agreed, so I went and did more reading. The key piece of the puzzle
that I was missing was in arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c 660-684.
/*
* Allocate DMA-coherent memory space and return both the kernel
* remapped
* virtual and bus address for that space.
*/
void *arm_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
gfp_t gfp, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
{
pgprot_t prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, pgprot_kernel);
void *memory;
if (dma_alloc_from_coherent(dev, size, handle, &memory))
return memory;
return __dma_alloc(dev, size, handle, gfp, prot, false,
__builtin_return_address(0));
}
static void *arm_coherent_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
{
pgprot_t prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, pgprot_kernel);
void *memory;
if (dma_alloc_from_coherent(dev, size, handle, &memory))
return memory;
return __dma_alloc(dev, size, handle, gfp, prot, true,
__builtin_return_address(0));
}
My understanding of this code is that when a driver requests dma memory,
we will first try to alloc from the per-driver pool. If that fails, we
will then attempt to allocate from the atomic_pool.
Once the atomic_pool is exhausted, we get the error:
ERROR: 1024 KiB atomic DMA coherent pool is too small!
Please increase it with coherent_pool= kernel parameter!
If my understanding is correct, one of the drivers (most likely one)
either asks for too small of a dma buffer, or is not properly
deallocating blocks from the per-device pool. Either case leads to
exhaustion, and falling back to the atomic pool. Which subsequently
gets wiped out as well.
Am I on the right track?
thx,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>