On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:55:14PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: [...] > > We can use mempressure w/o memcg, and even then it can (or should :) be > > useful (for cpuset, for example). > > The problem is that you end with, at the very least, duplicate > hierarchical accounting mechanisms which overlap with each other > while, most likely, being slightly different. About the same thing > happened with cpu and cpuacct controllers and we're now trying to > deprecate the latter. Yeah. I started answering your comments about hierarchical accounting, looked into the memcg code, and realized that *this* is where I need the memcg stuff. :) Thus yes, I guess I'll have to integrate it with memcg, or sort of. I will surely Cc you on the next interations. Thanks, Anton -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>