On 12/27/2012 06:04 PM, David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2012, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> That's exactly what happens with the patch. Note that in the current upstream >> version there are several slab checks scattered all over. >> >> In this case for example, I'm removing it from __alloc_bootmem_node(), but the >> first code line of__alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() is: >> >> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(slab_is_available())) >> return kzalloc(size, GFP_NOWAIT); >> > > You're only talking about mm/bootmem.c and not mm/nobootmem.c, and notice > that __alloc_bootmem_node() does not call __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic(), > it calls ___alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic(). Holy cow, this is an underscore hell. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>