On 2012/11/29 5:34, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> Depending on cgroup core locking - cgroup_mutex - is messy and makes
> cgroup prone to locking dependency problems. The current code already
> has lock dependency loop - memcg nests get_online_cpus() inside
> cgroup_mutex. cpuset the other way around.
>
> Regardless of the locking details, whatever is protecting cgroup has
> inherently to be something outer to most other locking constructs.
> cgroup calls into a lot of major subsystems which in turn have to
> perform subsystem-specific locking. Trying to nest cgroup
> synchronization inside other locks isn't something which can work
> well.
>
> cgroup now has enough API to allow subsystems to implement their own
> locking and cgroup_mutex is scheduled to be made private to cgroup
> core. This patchset makes cpuset implement its own locking instead of
> relying on cgroup_mutex.
>
> cpuset is rather nasty in this respect. Some of it seems to have come
> from the implementation history - cgroup core grew out of cpuset - but
> big part stems from cpuset's need to migrate tasks to an ancestor
> cgroup when an hotunplug event makes a cpuset empty (w/o any cpu or
> memory).
>
> This patchset decouples cpuset locking from cgroup_mutex. After the
> patchset, cpuset uses cpuset-specific cpuset_mutex instead of
> cgroup_mutex. This also removes the lockdep warning triggered during
> cpu offlining (see 0009).
>
> Note that this leaves memcg as the only external user of cgroup_mutex.
> Michal, Kame, can you guys please convert memcg to use its own locking
> too?
>
> This patchset contains the following thirteen patches.
>
> 0001-cpuset-remove-unused-cpuset_unlock.patch
> 0002-cpuset-remove-fast-exit-path-from-remove_tasks_in_em.patch
> 0003-cpuset-introduce-css_on-offline.patch
> 0004-cpuset-introduce-CS_ONLINE.patch
> 0005-cpuset-introduce-cpuset_for_each_child.patch
> 0006-cpuset-cleanup-cpuset-_can-_attach.patch
> 0007-cpuset-drop-async_rebuild_sched_domains.patch
> 0008-cpuset-reorganize-CPU-memory-hotplug-handling.patch
> 0009-cpuset-don-t-nest-cgroup_mutex-inside-get_online_cpu.patch
> 0010-cpuset-make-CPU-memory-hotplug-propagation-asynchron.patch
> 0011-cpuset-pin-down-cpus-and-mems-while-a-task-is-being-.patch
> 0012-cpuset-schedule-hotplug-propagation-from-cpuset_atta.patch
> 0013-cpuset-replace-cgroup_mutex-locking-with-cpuset-inte.patch
>
> 0001-0006 are prep patches.
>
> 0007-0009 make cpuset nest get_online_cpus() inside cgroup_mutex, not
> the other way around.
>
> 0010-0012 plug holes which would be exposed by switching to
> cpuset-specific locking.
>
> 0013 replaces cgroup_mutex with cpuset_mutex.
>
> This patchset is on top of cgroup/for-3.8 (fddfb02ad0) and also
> available in the following git branch.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git review-cpuset-locking
>
> diffstat follows.
>
> kernel/cpuset.c | 750 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 423 insertions(+), 327 deletions(-)
>
I reverted 38d7bee9d24adf4c95676a3dc902827c72930ebb ("cpuset: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY")
and applied this patchset against 3.8-rc1.
I created a cpuset which has cpuset.cpus=1, and I forked a few cpu-hog tasks
and moved them to this cpuset, and the final operations was offlining cpu1.
It stucked.
The only processes in D state are kworker threads:
# cat /proc/6/stack
[<ffffffff81062be1>] wait_rcu_gp+0x51/0x60
[<ffffffff810d18f6>] synchronize_sched+0x36/0x50
[<ffffffff810b1b84>] cgroup_attach_task+0x144/0x1a0
[<ffffffff810b737d>] cpuset_do_move_task+0x2d/0x40
[<ffffffff810b3887>] cgroup_scan_tasks+0x1a7/0x270
[<ffffffff810b9080>] cpuset_propagate_hotplug_workfn+0x130/0x360
[<ffffffff8105d9d3>] process_one_work+0x1c3/0x3c0
[<ffffffff81060e3a>] worker_thread+0x13a/0x400
[<ffffffff8106613e>] kthread+0xce/0xe0
[<ffffffff8144166c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
# cat /proc/80/stack
[<ffffffff81060015>] flush_workqueue+0x185/0x460
[<ffffffff810b8b90>] cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2f0/0x5b0
[<ffffffff8105d9d3>] process_one_work+0x1c3/0x3c0
[<ffffffff81060e3a>] worker_thread+0x13a/0x400
[<ffffffff8106613e>] kthread+0xce/0xe0
[<ffffffff8144166c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
After a while. dmesg:
[ 222.290677] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 222.292405] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
[ 229.383324] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 229.385415] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
[ 231.715738] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 231.717657] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
[ 287.773881] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 287.789983] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
[ 343.248988] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 4} (t=5250 jiffies g=1650 c=1649 q=2683)
[ 343.248998] Pid: 7861, comm: test3.sh Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1-0.7-default+ #6
[ 343.249000] Call Trace:
[ 343.249002] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810d11b9>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x249/0x770
[ 343.249018] [<ffffffff8109c150>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xc0/0xc0
[ 343.249021] [<ffffffff8109c150>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xc0/0xc0
[ 343.249028] [<ffffffff810521f6>] update_process_times+0x46/0x90
[ 343.249031] [<ffffffff8109bf9f>] tick_sched_handle+0x3f/0x50
[ 343.249034] [<ffffffff8109c1a4>] tick_sched_timer+0x54/0x90
[ 343.249037] [<ffffffff8106a99f>] __run_hrtimer+0xcf/0x1d0
[ 343.249040] [<ffffffff8106ace7>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xe7/0x220
[ 343.249048] [<ffffffff81443279>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x99
[ 343.249051] [<ffffffff81442332>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
[ 343.249053] <EOI> [<ffffffff81439320>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 343.249062] [<ffffffff8106fa60>] ? task_nice+0x20/0x20
[ 343.249066] [<ffffffff814224aa>] ? _cpu_down+0x19a/0x2e0
[ 343.249069] [<ffffffff8142262e>] cpu_down+0x3e/0x60
[ 343.249072] [<ffffffff81426635>] store_online+0x75/0xe0
[ 343.249076] [<ffffffff812fc450>] dev_attr_store+0x20/0x30
[ 343.249082] [<ffffffff811d6b07>] sysfs_write_file+0xc7/0x140
[ 343.249087] [<ffffffff811671bb>] vfs_write+0xcb/0x130
[ 343.249090] [<ffffffff81167a31>] sys_write+0x61/0xa0
[ 343.249093] [<ffffffff81441719>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 406.164733] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 4} (t=21003 jiffies g=1650 c=1649 q=9248)
[ 406.164741] Pid: 7861, comm: test3.sh Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1-0.7-default+ #6
[ 406.164743] Call Trace:
[ 406.164744] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810d11b9>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x249/0x770
[ 406.164753] [<ffffffff8109c150>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xc0/0xc0
[ 406.164756] [<ffffffff8109c150>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xc0/0xc0
[ 406.164760] [<ffffffff810521f6>] update_process_times+0x46/0x90
[ 406.164763] [<ffffffff8109bf9f>] tick_sched_handle+0x3f/0x50
[ 406.164766] [<ffffffff8109c1a4>] tick_sched_timer+0x54/0x90
[ 406.164769] [<ffffffff8106a99f>] __run_hrtimer+0xcf/0x1d0
[ 406.164771] [<ffffffff8106ace7>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xe7/0x220
[ 406.164777] [<ffffffff81443279>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x99
[ 406.164780] [<ffffffff81442332>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
[ 406.164781] <EOI> [<ffffffff814224aa>] ? _cpu_down+0x19a/0x2e0
[ 406.164787] [<ffffffff814224aa>] ? _cpu_down+0x19a/0x2e0
[ 406.164790] [<ffffffff8142262e>] cpu_down+0x3e/0x60
[ 406.164792] [<ffffffff81426635>] store_online+0x75/0xe0
[ 406.164795] [<ffffffff812fc450>] dev_attr_store+0x20/0x30
[ 406.164799] [<ffffffff811d6b07>] sysfs_write_file+0xc7/0x140
[ 406.164802] [<ffffffff811671bb>] vfs_write+0xcb/0x130
[ 406.164805] [<ffffffff81167a31>] sys_write+0x61/0xa0
[ 406.164808] [<ffffffff81441719>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
I did the same thing without this patchset, and everthing's fine.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>