On 12/20/2012 05:37 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On 12/19/2012 08:44 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: >>> The rmap walks in ksm.c are like those in rmap.c: >>> they can safely be done with anon_vma_lock_read(). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> Hi Hugh, >> >> This patch didn't fix the ksm oopses I'm seeing. > > I wouldn't expect it to (and should certainly have mentioned oopses > in the commit message if I'd intended): this patch was merely an > optimization/clarification of a commit gone in for 3.8-rc1. > > Understandable misunderstanding: you took my Cc too seriously, > I just thought I'd better keep Petr in the loop on current changes > to ksm.c, and foolishly kept you in too ;) > > Your oopses are on linux-next, which as of 20121220 still had Petr's > nice but buggy NUMA KSM patch in: it should go away when Stephen gets > a fresh mm update from Andrew, then reappear once his v6 goes into mm. > > To stop these oopses in get_mergeable_page (inlined in > unstable_tree_search_insert) you need the patch I showed on > Tuesday, which I hope he'll merge in for his v6. That doesn't fix > all of the problems, but hopefully all that you'll encounter before > I've devised a fix for the separate stale stable_nodes issue. My bad! I thought that this is the finalized version of the patch from Tuesday and was surprised when the oops was still there :) fwiw I'll use this to report that I'm not seeing any unexpected behaviour with this patch applied. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>