On Thu, Dec 20 2012, Minchan Kim wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h > index a92061e..4ada4ef 100644 > --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h > +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h > @@ -1,6 +1,25 @@ > #ifndef __LINUX_PAGEISOLATION_H > #define __LINUX_PAGEISOLATION_H > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION > +static inline bool page_isolated_pageblock(struct page *page) > +{ > + return get_pageblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_ISOLATE; > +} > +static inline bool mt_isolated_pageblock(int migratetype) > +{ > + return migratetype == MIGRATE_ISOLATE; > +} Perhaps “is_migrate_isolate” to match already existing “is_migrate_cma”? Especially as the “mt_isolated_pageblock” sound confusing to me, it implies that it works on pageblocks which it does not. > +#else > +static inline bool page_isolated_pageblock(struct page *page) > +{ > + return false; > +} > +static inline bool mt_isolated_pageblock(int migratetype) > +{ > + return false; > +} > +#endif > > bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count, > bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages); -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Attachment:
pgpVBAszQVq5R.pgp
Description: PGP signature