Re: [PATCH] mm: Suppress mm/memory.o warning on older compilers if !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:49:17 +0000
Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The kbuild test robot reported the following after the merge of Automatic
> NUMA Balancing when cross-compiling for avr32.
> 
> mm/memory.c: In function 'do_pmd_numa_page':
> mm/memory.c:3593: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void
> 
> The code is unreachable but the avr32 cross-compiler was not new enough
> to know that. This patch suppresses the warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index e6a3b93..23f1fdf 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3590,6 +3590,7 @@ static int do_pmd_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		     unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp)
>  {
>  	BUG();
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */

Odd.  avr32's BUG() includes a call to unreachable(), which should
evaluate to "do { } while (1)".  Can you check that this is working?

Perhaps it _is_ working, but the compiler incorrectly thinks that the
function can return?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]