On 12/14/2012 03:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
I can answer the later. Because memsw comes with its price and
swappiness is much cheaper. On the other hand it makes sense that
swappiness==0 doesn't swap at all. Or do you think we should get back to
_almost_ doesn't swap at all?
swappiness==0 will swap in emergencies, specifically when we have
almost no page cache left, we will still swap things out:
if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
if (unlikely(file + free <= high_wmark_pages(zone))) {
/*
* If we have very few page cache pages, force-scan
* anon pages.
*/
fraction[0] = 1;
fraction[1] = 0;
denominator = 1;
goto out;
This makes sense, because people who set swappiness==0 but
do have swap space available would probably prefer some
emergency swapping over an OOM kill.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>