(12/12/12 11:49 PM), Dave Hansen wrote: > On 12/12/2012 06:03 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:48 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: >>> But if we went and did it per-DIMM (showing which physical addresses and >>> NUMA nodes a DIMM maps to), wouldn't that be redundant with this >>> proposed interface? >> >> If DIMMs overlap between nodes, then we wouldn't have an exact range for >> a node in question. Having both approaches would complement each other. > > How is that possible? If NUMA nodes are defined by distances from CPUs > to memory, how could a DIMM have more than a single distance to any > given CPU? numa_emulation? just guess. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>