Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: create hugetlb cgroup file in hugetlb_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012/12/13 1:05, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

> Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> Build kernel with CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y,CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE=y
>> and CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB=y, then specify hugepagesz=xx boot option,
>> system will boot fail.
>>
>> This failure is caused by following code path:
>> setup_hugepagesz
>> 	hugetlb_add_hstate
>> 		hugetlb_cgroup_file_init
>> 			cgroup_add_cftypes
>> 				kzalloc <--slab is *not available* yet
>>
>> For this path, slab is not available yet, so memory allocated will be
>> failed, and cause WARN_ON() in hugetlb_cgroup_file_init().
>>
>> So I move hugetlb_cgroup_file_init() into hugetlb_init().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h |    7 ++-----
>>  mm/hugetlb.c                   |   11 +----------
>>  mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c            |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
>> index d73878c..5bb9c28 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
>>  					 struct page *page);
>>  extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
>>  					   struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg);
>> -extern int hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(int idx) __init;
>> +extern void hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(void) __init;
>>  extern void hugetlb_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldhpage,
>>  				   struct page *newhpage);
>>
>> @@ -111,10 +111,7 @@ hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
>>  	return;
>>  }
>>
>> -static inline int __init hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(int idx)
>> -{
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> +static inline void __init hugetlb_cgroup_file_init() {}
>>
>>  static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldhpage,
>>  					  struct page *newhpage)
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 1ef2cd4..a30da48 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -1906,14 +1906,12 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
>>  		default_hstate.max_huge_pages = default_hstate_max_huge_pages;
>>
>>  	hugetlb_init_hstates();
>> -
>>  	gather_bootmem_prealloc();
>> -
>>  	report_hugepages();
>>
>>  	hugetlb_sysfs_init();
>> -
>>  	hugetlb_register_all_nodes();
>> +	hugetlb_cgroup_file_init();
>>
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -1943,13 +1941,6 @@ void __init hugetlb_add_hstate(unsigned order)
>>  	h->next_nid_to_free = first_node(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
>>  	snprintf(h->name, HSTATE_NAME_LEN, "hugepages-%lukB",
>>  					huge_page_size(h)/1024);
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Add cgroup control files only if the huge page consists
>> -	 * of more than two normal pages. This is because we use
>> -	 * page[2].lru.next for storing cgoup details.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (order >= HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
>> -		hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(hugetlb_max_hstate - 1);
>>
>>  	parsed_hstate = h;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
>> index a3f358f..284cb68 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
>> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static char *mem_fmt(char *buf, int size, unsigned long hsize)
>>  	return buf;
>>  }
>>
>> -int __init hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(int idx)
>> +static void __init __hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(int idx)
>>  {
>>  	char buf[32];
>>  	struct cftype *cft;
>> @@ -382,7 +382,26 @@ int __init hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(int idx)
>>
>>  	WARN_ON(cgroup_add_cftypes(&hugetlb_subsys, h->cgroup_files));
>>
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __init hugetlb_cgroup_file_init()
>> +{
>> +	struct hstate *h;
>> +	int idx;
>> +
>> +	idx = 0;
>> +	for_each_hstate(h) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Add cgroup control files only if the huge page consists
>> +		 * of more than two normal pages. This is because we use
>> +		 * page[2].lru.next for storing cgoup details.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (h->order >= HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
>> +			__hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(idx);
> 
> Is it better to say ?
> 
>              if (huge_page_order(h) >= HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
>                           __hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(hstate_index(h));

Hi Aneesh,

Thanks for your review and suggestion, this is better.

Thanks,
Jianguo Wu

> 
> It should be ok both case.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> +
>> +		idx++;
>> +	}
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> -- 1.7.1
> 
> -anesh
> 
> 
> .
> 



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]