Re: [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:18:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > This is prototype only but what I was using as a reference 
> > > to see could I spot a problem in yours. It has not been even 
> > > boot tested but avoids remote->remote copies, contending on 
> > > PTL or holding it longer than necessary (should anyway)
> > 
> > So ... because time is running out and it would be nice to 
> > progress with this for v3.8, I'd suggest the following 
> > approach:
> > 
> >  - Please send your current tree to Linus as-is. You already 
> >    have my Acked-by/Reviewed-by for its scheduler bits, and my
> >    testing found your tree to have no regression to mainline,
> >    plus it's a nice win in a number of NUMA-intense workloads.
> >    So it's a good, monotonic step forward in terms of NUMA
> >    balancing, very close to what the bits I'm working on need as
> >    infrastructure.
> > 
> >  - I'll rebase all my devel bits on top of it. Instead of
> >    removing the migration bandwidth I'll simply increase it for
> >    testing - this should trigger similarly aggressive behavior.
> >    I'll try to touch as little of the mm/ code as possible, to
> >    keep things debuggable.
> 
> One minor last-minute request/nit before you send it to Linus, 
> would you mind doing a:
> 
>    CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA => CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> 
> rename please? (I can do it for you if you don't have the time.)
> 
> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING is really what fits into our existing NUMA 
> namespace, CONFIG_NUMA, CONFIG_NUMA_EMU - and, more importantly, 
> the ordering of words follows the common generic -> less generic 
> ordering we do in the kernel for config names and methods.
> 
> So it would fit nicely into existing Kconfig naming schemes:
> 
>    CONFIG_TRACING
>    CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING
>    CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING
> 
> etc.
> 

Yes, that makes sense. I should have spotted the rationale. I also took
the liberty of renaming the command-line parameter and the variables to
be consistent with this.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]