Re: [GIT TREE] Unified NUMA balancing tree, v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/10/2012 01:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

So autonuma and numacore are basically on the same page, with a slight
advantage for numacore in the THP enabled case. balancenuma is closer
to mainline than to autonuma/numacore.

Indeed, when the system is fully loaded, numacore does very well.

The main issues that have been observed with numacore are when
the system is only partially loaded. Something strange seems to
be going on that causes performance regressions in that situation.

--
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]