Hi Liu, Wu,
On 12/06/2012 10:26 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2012-12-6 9:26, Tang Chen wrote:
On 12/05/2012 11:43 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
If we make "movablecore_map" take precedence over "movablecore/kernelcore",
the logic could be simplified. I think it's not so attractive to support
both "movablecore_map" and "movablecore/kernelcore" at the same time.
Thanks for the advice of removing movablecore/kernelcore. But since we
didn't plan to do this in the beginning, and movablecore/kernelcore are
more user friendly, I think for now, I'll handle DMA and low memory
address problems as you mentioned, and just keep movablecore/kernelcore
in the next version. :)
And about the SRAT, I think it is necessary to many users. I think we
should provide both interfaces. I may give a try in the next version.
Thanks. :)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>