On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:22:38PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 12/04/2012 05:11 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > >>>> Any chance you could retry with this patch on top? > >> > >> It does not apply to -next :/. Should I try anything else? > > > > The COMPACTION_BUILD changed to IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION), below > > is a -next patch. I hope you don't run into other problems that come > > out of -next craziness, because Linus is kinda waiting for this to be > > resolved to release 3.8. If you've always tested against -next so far > > and it worked otherwise, don't change the environment now, please. If > > you just started, it would make more sense to test based on 3.7-rc8. > > I reported the issue as soon as it appeared in -next for the first time > on Oct 12. Since then I'm constantly hitting the issue (well, there were > more than one I suppose, but not all of them were fixed by now) until > now. I run only -next... Okay. Yes, it was a couple of problems, but not everybody hit the same subset. > Going to apply the patch now. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>