On Fri 30-11-12 13:12:29, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > (2012/11/27 3:47), Michal Hocko wrote: > > Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is > > no need to keep css_get_next in the place. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> > > Hm, then, the next think will be css_is_ancestor() etc.. Good point I thought that the only remaining part is swap accounting. It is not directly with the iterators so I will send a separate patch. Tejun said he has a replacement that could be used for the swap accounting and then the whole css_id can be buried. > > Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the review of the whole patchset, Kame! I would like to hear back from Johannes and then resubmit the series to Andrew. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>