Re: [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages occupied by memmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/28/12 23:52, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:09:46 +0800
Jiang Liu <liuj97@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages occupied by memmap

How are people to test this?  "does it boot"?


I've been running kernels with Gerry's 5 patches applied for 11 days now. This is on a 64bit laptop but with a 32bit kernel + HIGHMEM. I joined the conversation because my laptop would not resume from suspend to disk - it either froze or rebooted. With the patches applied the laptop does successfully resume and has been stable.

Since Monday, I have have been running a kernel with the patches (plus, from today, the patch you mailed yesterday) applied to 3.7rc7, without problems.

Thanks,
Chris

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]