On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:54:45PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: > On 11/28/2012 03:35 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Lockdep complains about recursive deadlock of zram->init_lock. > > [1] made it false positive because we can't request IO to zram > > before setting disksize. Anyway, we should shut lockdep up to > > avoid many reporting from user. > > > > This patch allocates zram's metadata out of lock so we can fix it. > > Is that me or the functions zram_meta_alloc/free are missing? Who bite my zram_meta_alloc/free? :) Will resend with your suggestion for removing GFP_ATOMIC. Thanks! > > Regards, > Jerome -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>