On 11/28/2012 06:48 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:50:14 +0300 (EEST):
> ...
>>>>> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 12:04 +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
>>>>>> index a1a7225..9eae3be 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
>>>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>>>>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +#include <asm/dma-iommu.h>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> #include "base.h"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #define to_platform_driver(drv) (container_of((drv), struct
>>>>>> platform_driver, \
>>>>>> @@ -305,8 +307,19 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device
>>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>>> dev_name(&pdev->dev), dev_name(pdev->dev.parent));
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ret = device_add(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>> - if (ret == 0)
>>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>> + goto failed;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PLATFORM_ENABLE_IOMMU
>>>>>> + if (platform_bus_type.map && !pdev->dev.archdata.mapping) {
>>>>>> + ret = arm_iommu_attach_device(&pdev->dev,
>>>>>> + platform_bus_type.map);
>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>> + goto failed;
>>>>>
>>>>> This is horrible ... you're adding an architecture specific callback
>>>>> into our generic code; that's really a no-no. If the concept of
>>>>> CONFIG_PLATFORM_ENABE_IOMMU is useful to more than just arm, then this
>>>>> could become a generic callback.
>>>>
>>>> As mentioned in the original, this is a heck to explain what is
>>>> needed. I am looking for some generic solution for how to specify
>>>> IOMMU info for each platform devices. I'm guessing that some other SoC
>>>> may have the similar requirements on the above. As you mentioned, this
>>>> solution should be a generic, not arch specific.
>>>
>>> Please read more about bus notifiers. IMHO a good example is provided in
>>> the following thread:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg12238.html
>>
>> This bus notifier seems enough flexible to afford the variation of
>> IOMMU map info, like Tegra ASID, which could be platform-specific, and
>> the other could be common too. There's already iommu_bus_notifier
>> too. I'll try to implement something base on this.
>
> Experimentally implemented as below. With the followig patch, each
> device could specify its own map in DT, and automatically the device
> would be attached to the map.
>
> There is a case that some devices share a map. This patch doesn't
> suppor such case yet.
>
> From 8cb75bb6f3a8535a077e0e85265f87c1f1289bfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:47:04 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: tegra: bus_notifier registers IOMMU devices
>
> platform_bus notifier registers IOMMU devices if dma-window is
> specified.
>
> Its format is:
> dma-window = <"start" "size">;
> ex)
> dma-window = <0x12345000 0x8000>;
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt-tegra30.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shouldn't this patch be to the IOMMU driver itself, not the core Tegra code?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>