On 11/27/2012 01:47 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/27/2012 04:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin Wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more flexible.
... but *much* harder for users, so movable_node is better in most cases.
But numa is initialized very later, and we need the information in SRAT...
Thanks
Wen Congyang
I think you need to deal with it for usability reasons, though...
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>